Processing math: 0%

Thursday, May 31, 2012

More on intermediate convergence


According to the vectorial version of the Riesz-Alexandroff representation theorem, the dual norm |u|BV= is also the total mass |Du|(\Omega)=\int_{\Omega}|Du| of the total variation |Du| of the measure Du.

Moreover, from classical integration theory, the integral \int_{\Omega}\phi \,d(Du) is well defined for all Du integrable functions \phi from \Omega into \mathbb{R}^N, e.g. for functions in C_b(\Omega, \mathbb{R}^N). For the same reasons, \int_{\Omega}\phi\, d|Du| is well defined for all |Du| integrable functions \phi, in particular for functions in C_b(\Omega).

Thus, we can say that |Du_n|\rightharpoonup |Du| narrowly in M(\Omega) if \int_{\Omega}\phi \, d|Du_n|\rightarrow \int_{\Omega}\phi\,d|Du|, for all \phi \in C_b(\Omega). If we choose \phi\equiv 1 on \Omega then \Vert Du_n \Vert \rightarrow \Vert Du \Vert i.e. |u_n|_{BV}\rightarrow |u|_{BV}.

Hence, u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(\Omega) and the narrow convergence of measures, |Du_n|\rightharpoonup |Du| in M(\Omega) implies the intermediate convergence, u_n\rightharpoonup u (i.e. u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(\Omega) and |u_n|_{BV}\rightarrow |u|_{BV}).


We have the following proposition regarding the intermediate convergence.

Proposition
The following three assertions are equivalent
(i) u_n\rightharpoonup u in the sense of intermediate convergence.
(ii) u_n\rightharpoonup u in BV(\Omega) and \vert u_n \vert_{BV}\rightarrow \vert u \vert_{BV}.
(iii) u_n\rightarrow u strongly in L^1(\Omega) and \vert Du_n \vert\rightharpoonup \vert Du \vert narrowly in M(\Omega).

Proof
The equivalence (i) to (ii) is a consequence of a proposition from the previous post. We have just seen above that (i) and (iii) are equivalent. We only need to prove that (ii) implies (iii).

Recall that u_n\rightharpoonup u weakly in BV(\Omega) means that
(a) u_n\rightarrow u strongly in L^1(\Omega) and
(b) the measures Du_n\rightharpoonup Du weakly in M(\Omega, \mathbb{R}^N).

Also, recall that for non-negative Borel measures \mu_n and \mu in M(\Omega) the following statements are equivalent:
(c) \mu_n(\Omega)\rightarrow \mu(\Omega) and \mu(U)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}\mu_n(U) for all open subsets U\subset \Omega.
(d) \mu_n\rightharpoonup \mu narrowly in M(\Omega).

Let, \mu_n=|Du_n| and \mu=|Du|. We have been given that |Du_n|(\Omega)\rightarrow |Du|(\Omega) i.e. we have \mu_n(\Omega)\rightarrow \mu(\Omega). For showing the narrow convergence \mu_n\rightharpoonup \mu we just need to prove the lower-semicontinuity property on U\subset\Omega,
i.e. we need to show that for \mu(U)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}\mu_n(U) for all open subsets U\subset \Omega,
i.e. we need to show that for |Du|(U)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}|Du_n|(U) for all open subsets U\subset \Omega.

To this effect we use the proposition from the previous blog which says that if u_n\in BV(\Omega) with |u_n|_{BV(\Omega)} bounded, with u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(\Omega), then we have the lower semicontinuity property i.e. |Du|(\Omega)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}|Du_n|(\Omega), and u\in BV(\Omega).

Let U\subset\Omega be any open subset. We have u_n\in BV(\Omega), thus as U\subset\Omega, we have u_n\in BV(U). Thus, we have \sup_n |Du_n|(U)\leq \sup_n |Du_n|(\Omega)<\infty.

The weak convergence u_n\rightharpoonup u in L^1(\Omega) implies the strong convergence u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(\Omega) and thus the strong convergence u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(U) follows as U\subset \Omega.

 Now that we have the conditions in the proposition: u_n\in BV(U), \sup_n |Du_n|(U)<\infty, and u_n\rightarrow u in L^1(U) we have the lower semicontinuity property: |Du|(U)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}|Du_n|(U) for all open subsets U\subset \Omega

As we have |Du_n|(\Omega)\rightarrow |Du|(\Omega) and |Du|(U)\leq \lim\inf_{n\rightarrow\infty}|Du_n|(U) for all open subsets U\subset \Omega, from the equivalence of (c) and (d) we get the narrow convergence: |Du_n|\rightharpoonup |Du_n| narrowly in M(\Omega). \,\,\hspace{25pt} \square.

In conclusion, intermediate convergence implies narrow convergence of |Du_n|.


No comments:

Post a Comment